Politicians & Public Figures
Opposition research, Wikipedia edit wars, and deepfake audio are now as much a search-ranking problem as a legal one.
Opposition research and bad-faith Wikipedia editing used to live in offline consultant files. Today, a single Wikipedia revision spawns news citations, feeds AI training data, and becomes the 'source of record' for AI answer engines within weeks.
Five pressure points unique to politicians & public figures.
Opposition research SERP dominance
Oppo dumps weaponized through partner media outlets index faster than rebuttal — first-page SERP becomes campaign attack ad.
Wikipedia edit-war escalation
Vandals and bad-faith editors control narrative — revert wars damage credibility, and AI systems cite Wikipedia as authoritative even mid-dispute.
Deepfake audio & video attacks
Bad actors release fake audio of controversial statements or compromising video — spreads across social before detection, cited as 'evidence' by news outlets.
AI answer framing of unverified allegations
ChatGPT/Perplexity summarize news cycle accusations as settled fact — 'known for' or 'alleged to' language launders unproven claims into AI-canonized narrative.
The disciplines we typically run for politicians & public figures clients.
Online Reputation Repair
Reclaim the first page of your name with content that survives Google's quality raters and AI summaries.
Read protocol Atlas ProtocolWikipedia Management
COI-compliant Wikipedia work that survives admin review — because if your page reverts, you lose more than the edit.
Read protocol Sentinel ProtocolDeepfake & Synthetic Media Removal
Identify, document, and remove non-consensual deepfakes, synthetic voice clones, and AI-generated impersonations from every platform in 48 hours.
Read protocol Rapid Response ProtocolCrisis PR & Rapid Response
Six-hour SLA. Senior counsel, holding statement, media tree, takedown legal — by the time the story breaks, the response is already moving.
Read protocolCongressional candidate defends against coordinated oppo dump and deepfake audio attack.
A general-election candidate faced a coordinated oppo drop: opposition research report shared with 6 sympathetic news outlets, Wikipedia edits flagging 'controversies,' and a deepfake audio clip of 'private remarks.' All indexed within 48 hours; ChatGPT began citing the allegations as context. The Citadel Protocol removed synthetic media from platforms, worked with Wikipedia editors to flag disputed claims, and built authentic earned media through policy positions and community endorsements. Within 90 days, opposition content dropped from 5 of top 10 SERP results. Downstream polling showed 47% reduction in 'unsure' voters citing 'confusing oppo rumors.'
See all case studiesThe standing engagement opens with a private call.
A single conversation, signed under non-disclosure, with the principal who would own your matter. You leave with a printed posture assessment and the engagement letter, whether or not you retain us.